In a remote village in Central Africa, five young children died during a desperate attempt by their families to reach the nearest functioning hospital—located more than 25 miles away.
Local aid workers and international relief organizations are attributing the tragedy, in part, to former President Donald Trump’s sweeping foreign aid cuts under his “America First” doctrine, which they argue crippled essential healthcare infrastructure in the region.
The incident occurred earlier this year in a drought-stricken part of the Sahel, where medical resources have been depleted, clinics have closed, and humanitarian aid has shrunk in both funding and reach.
According to officials with Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders), the children, aged between 1 and 7, suffered from preventable illnesses that could have been treated with basic supplies such as antibiotics, IV fluids, and access to emergency transport.
Aid Cuts and Lasting Impacts
During his administration, Trump championed a sharp pivot in U.S. foreign policy—prioritizing domestic economic and military interests over foreign humanitarian assistance.
Between 2017 and 2020, the Trump administration proposed steep reductions to foreign aid budgets, targeting major programs administered through USAID, the U.S. Department of State, and international bodies like the World Health Organization.
While many of those proposed cuts were rejected by Congress, some were implemented through executive maneuvering or administrative delays, effectively slashing funding to maternal health programs, nutritional assistance, and child immunization initiatives in vulnerable regions.
“These policies didn’t just shift priorities; they dismantled lifelines,” said Dr. Lina Adama, a pediatric specialist working with a UNICEF-backed mobile clinic in West Africa. “Entire rural communities were left with no healthcare workers, no medicine, and no ambulances. This is the human cost of those choices.”
A Journey Marked by Tragedy
According to local reports, the children’s families began their journey before dawn, carrying the sick youngsters in makeshift hammocks and wheelbarrows over dry, rugged terrain.
The closest hospital, which used to operate a satellite clinic nearby, had been forced to consolidate its services after its international funding dried up.
Three children reportedly died en route to the hospital, while two others succumbed shortly after arrival due to a lack of pediatric intensive care equipment.
The local hospital, overwhelmed and under-resourced, had already reported multiple deaths that month due to treatable conditions such as malaria and acute diarrhea.
A Preventable Loss
International development analysts argue that the situation is not isolated. The decline in U.S. global health funding between 2017 and 2020 contributed to the closure of nearly 60 rural medical outposts across sub-Saharan Africa.
These outposts provided services such as prenatal care, infant vaccination, and malnutrition treatment—all critical in preventing childhood deaths.
“Without ongoing U.S. support, our capacity to respond to outbreaks and provide maternal-child care collapsed,” said Nia Balozi, a regional director with the International Rescue Committee. “We lost the backbone of health systems in some of the poorest areas.”
The Trump administration often defended its budget cuts by framing them as a strategy to reduce U.S. dependency on foreign engagements. In one 2018 White House statement, Trump said: “We are not the world’s piggy bank.” He argued that countries should become more self-reliant and that U.S. taxpayer dollars should focus on domestic needs.
But critics said the short-term savings came at the cost of long-term stability and human lives.
Broader Ramifications
Healthcare isn’t the only sector impacted. Cuts to education, food programs, and clean water initiatives have also had a cascading effect. According to the Congressional Research Service, reductions in foreign aid under the “America First” policy disproportionately affected sub-Saharan Africa and war-torn regions of the Middle East.
Public health experts warn that as global health crises such as pandemics and climate-related disease outbreaks grow more severe, these vulnerable regions are increasingly at risk.
“It’s no exaggeration to say that these children would still be alive if not for the dismantling of the systems that once protected them,” said Dr. Adama.
A Shift in Policy?
The Biden administration has reversed several of Trump’s foreign aid restrictions, restoring funding to WHO and expanding global health security programs. However, rebuilding takes time.
“We are working to restore partnerships and funding,” said a spokesperson for USAID. “But communities devastated by years of disinvestment can’t be fixed overnight.”
For the families who lost their children, that restoration may come too late.
“We don’t need politics. We need medicine,” said a grieving father, who lost both his daughters during the trek. “They were just little girls who wanted to grow up.”
Disclaimer – Our team has carefully fact-checked this article to make sure it’s accurate and free from any misinformation. We’re dedicated to keeping our content honest and reliable for our readers.