Former President Donald Trump has floated the idea of eliminating the federal income tax in favor of a national tariff system. While this proposal has gained traction among his supporters, it raises significant concerns about how different states would be affected.
States that rely heavily on federal funding or have no state income tax could see major financial consequences if this policy were implemented. While some states could benefit from a simplified tax structure, others would lose essential revenue streams, making them among the least likely to benefit from such a shift.
Here’s a look at the 10 states that would benefit the least from eliminating federal income taxes.
How Would Eliminating Federal Income Taxes Work?
Trump’s proposal suggests replacing the federal income tax with a tariff-based system, meaning that instead of taxing individual earnings, the U.S. would generate revenue through import taxes on foreign goods.
Proponents argue that this move could:
- Increase take-home pay for American workers.
- Simplify the tax system by removing complex income brackets.
- Encourage domestic production by making imported goods more expensive.
However, critics warn that:
- Lower-income and middle-class Americans could pay more as tariffs raise the price of goods.
- Federal programs funded by income taxes (Social Security, Medicare, infrastructure projects) could suffer significant cuts.
- States that rely on federal funding may experience budget shortfalls.
10 States That Would Benefit the Least
Some states would struggle more than others under this proposal, particularly those that depend on federal funds or have low or no state income tax.
1. Mississippi
Mississippi receives one of the highest levels of federal aid per capita. Without federal income tax revenue, the state could struggle to fund healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
2. West Virginia
West Virginia has a large elderly population, meaning many residents rely on Social Security and Medicare, both of which could face funding cuts under a tariff-based system.
3. New Mexico
New Mexico has a high poverty rate and heavily relies on federal assistance. If income taxes were eliminated, the state could lose essential funding for public programs.
4. Kentucky
Kentucky is another state that receives more in federal aid than it contributes in taxes. Eliminating income taxes could create major budget gaps for healthcare and welfare programs.
5. Arkansas
Arkansas has a relatively low tax base and depends on federal assistance to maintain infrastructure and public services. A shift to a tariff system could increase costs for residents.
6. Louisiana
Louisiana frequently requires federal disaster relief funding due to hurricanes and flooding. Without federal income tax revenue, disaster recovery efforts could be underfunded.
7. South Carolina
South Carolina has a significant military and federal workforce presence. If funding for federal jobs decreases, the state’s economy could suffer.
8. Montana
Montana has a small population but relies heavily on federal funds for education, healthcare, and infrastructure projects. A loss of income tax revenue could destabilize state budgets.
9. Alabama
Alabama has low state tax revenue and high reliance on federal programs. Without federal income taxes, many essential services could face severe funding shortages.
10. North Dakota
North Dakota has a small tax base and benefits from federal agriculture subsidies. If income taxes were eliminated, farmers and rural communities could face significant challenges.
Who Would Benefit the Most?
States with higher wages and lower reliance on federal aid would likely benefit more from this proposal. These include:
- Texas – With no state income tax and a strong economy, Texas could see an increase in disposable income.
- Florida – Another no-income-tax state that attracts retirees and businesses.
- Nevada – Tourism and gaming revenue could make up for losses in federal funds.
Economic Concerns with a Tariff-Based System
While the idea of eliminating income taxes sounds appealing to many, economists warn that a tariff-based system could have unintended consequences:
- Higher Prices for Consumers – Tariffs on imports mean higher costs for everyday goods, disproportionately affecting low-income families.
- Job Losses in Export-Dependent Industries – American businesses that rely on global trade could suffer if other countries impose retaliatory tariffs.
- Reduced Federal Revenue Stability – Income taxes provide a steady revenue stream, whereas tariffs fluctuate based on trade volume.
Could This Policy Become a Reality?
Trump’s proposal would require congressional approval, making it unlikely to pass in its current form. However, it raises questions about the future of the U.S. tax system and whether alternatives, such as a national sales tax or flat tax, could gain political traction.
If Trump is re-elected, expect further debates on tax reform, with potential shifts in how the government funds essential programs.
Conclusion
The idea of eliminating federal income taxes is a bold proposal that would not impact all states equally. While high-income and no-income-tax states could see some benefits, states that rely heavily on federal funding and social programs could suffer significant financial setbacks.
As the 2024 election approaches, this policy proposal will likely be a key topic in the debate over tax reform and economic policy.
For more on how Trump’s tax policies could affect the economy, visit Forbes.
Disclaimer – Our team has carefully fact-checked this article to make sure it’s accurate and free from any misinformation. We’re dedicated to keeping our content honest and reliable for our readers.